R.I.P VANS with seats, long live… just what is the Espace
exactly? It started off so simply: the first generation made us understand that
there was more space than a normal car, that the engine occupied a smaller
space and that this probably wasn’t a driver's car. Visibility was excellent,
and inside we found more seats than usual. The first Renault MPV was a pleasant
surprise.
That was a purely proportional and architectural association, before feature and form implied status and emotions. The new Espace has grown
curves out of no-where and the rocker is now knee-height. This, a feature that
was once conceived to be stepped upon! But it does not matter, because the
result is extremely impressive. The car needed to change, because the world
changed around it. Customers now assume the versatility, so the design has to
not just stand like a first-gen wall-flower, but engage and convince. This is
not easy, and it is why Renault has propagated the crossover trend.
Who would have thought a mainstream brand that focused on families could be a niche? Yet Renault has done it better than anyone, and a big part of the success is understanding the brand and executing those sculptural surfaces. These are forms that demand to be touched, encouraging a physical connection with the car, while acting as a metaphor for the intimacy of family. In a market where the precision of creases is shorthand for premium, Renault has concentrated on volumes, lending affordable cars authenticity in place of pretension.
But I feel a trick has been missed. The new Espace does much
to justify its place in the Renault range and on the shopping-lists of
families, yet the final push to Volvo XC90 levels of usability has
been shied away from. This is ironic as the Swedish SUV was conceived to offer
the flexibility of the French van. Renault might do well to raise the roof, increase accommodation and
resurrect the Grand Espace.


No comments:
Post a Comment